4 Apr 2013 12:39 pm
So what? For over 200 years, the Constitution was never held to rule on this at all.Why shouldn't it be left to our elected representatives, not to an unaccountable court?I guess you missed the part of your own link (which of course is from the right wing Heritage Foundation) that said, "the Court overturned the 17-year-old precedent of Bowers v. Hardwick"The last ruling is the one that counts Puss, and that was the 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas.Cuccinelli had a chance to bring Virginia's Crimes Against Nature (anti-sodomy) law into line with the Lawrence v Texas ruling, and he declined to do that, because of his bigotry towards gay people.I find it curious that you go around saying that it's us Libs who want 'almost every aspect of Americans' lives by micro-managed by law' when you are the one who thinks that the government should be able to dictate what consenting adults in a private relationship do in their bedroom.That's the absolute height of micro-management of people's lives.