Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Today 1:12 pm
I see no reason why you can't be asked to demonstrate an understanding of what is discussed in the "citation"..Vegas » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You are owed a spam. Enjoy:
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Veghead's most recent gems:More evidence Veghead never went to college.
- Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
- Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
Do you understand the point about the Triffin Paradox?