Today 9:38 am
A) Quote the sourcesHuey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ viewtopic.php?f=3&t=103562
On that thread he posted that the CEO of a company that was awarded the reflecting pool contract was being prosecuted for election fraud in his cut and paste OP from the daily beast. The problem was that the man was convicted of it a couple of years ago and the Supreme Court of NH OVERTURNED the conviction. There is no mention of this in his OP and the daily beast issued a correction later in the day.
B) That the conviction was reversed does not mean he was never convicted.
C) Until you can offer any evidence that the State has actually dropped the case, the logical conclusion is that his negotiations with the AG are for the purpose of settling it.