Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
It has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you've been lying about having read the narrative of the facts of the case.
You story was wrong and had to be corrected. End of **** story.
That has nothing to do with the fact the original daily beast story you chose was wrong, had to be corrected and you did not mention that the case was overturned until I told you.
You have already lost this debate. Hell, you started two diversion threads reframe.
I posted the original daily beast BS, then the corrected version.