22 Feb 2016 8:20 pm
I wonder why he changed the title of the piece he linked to?bingster » 22 Feb 2016 3:44 pm » wrote:Despite reading your entire link, I found nothing to say that "fracking can't contaminate ground water". What science are you imagining?
The actual title is: Even Obama’s EPA Now Admits Fracking Hasn’t Harmed Water Supplies
Nowhere in that piece does it say that there is NO danger to ground water from fracking.
It only says that the EPA did not find widespread, systematic impacts on drinking water.
His link is an opinion piece from the National Review.
I found another piece written on the exact same day from what claims to be an independent, non-profit, non-partisan source.
Fracking Has Contaminated Drinking Water, EPA Now Concludes
I also found a second source written three days later.
EPA says fracking could contaminate drinking water.
All three sources are based on the same EPA report, yet the second two seem to interpret it differently from the first.
And radically different than the way GB sees it.