If your entire position hinges on anonymous sources and secondhand chatter, you haven't taken a stand—you've just admitted you have no real proof. That is my stand on your OP, Douche.Blackvegetable » 19 Sep 2026, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑You've taken no stand on the former, and ran from the latter.Huey » 19 Sep 2026, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Mary, are we taking down your garbage original point on this thread, or are we sticking to the Supreme Court diversion you fled to when the first one imploded?