Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:57 pm

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:51 pm

Again, my henry 45 repeating rifle was designed specifically for combat.  You want that banned as well?

So although none of the weapons you want banned fit the category of "designed for the battlefield" you want them banned because of broad appeal.  Now that is just plain stupid.

 my henry 45 repeating rifle was designed specifically for combat. 

You ran from this before...

For what conflict was the henry 45 designed?

So although none of the weapons you want banned fit the category of "designed for the battlefield"

A sabre was designed for "battle".....I don't have an issue with collectors, but I draw the line at carry, concealed or otherwise...

an assault weapon, as one of its principal features, is designed to kill in volume and to leave the wounded requiring a lot of assets to repair.

This has no civilian application. Accordingly, a weapon designed for such satisfies no legitimate civilian purpose...

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:49 pm

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm

Why did you remove exactly what they changed?  Lying a lil bit?  They changed the entire inner workings which is a redesign.  You want it banned because it looks scary.  The weapons that you claim are ok have the exact same function as the one's you want banned.  An unnatural fear based on ignorance.

Do you know what those parts do?  You better get googling.

Because it doesn't matter in the context of the purpose of its design and development...or its broad appeal to the Subnormal.