Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 4:26 pm

FOS » 16 Oct 2020, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 4:22 pm

The funny part about all this is that a 'Weapon designed for military use' is not mevessarily a good choice for terrorism or crime. A gun used in the military is assuming about 200 yards of distance...enemy also having guns...and body armor...and hopes to injure more than it kills because injury consumes more enemy resources than death.

So the category itself is odd to focus on. If i wanted to kill a bunch of unarmed citizens id probably prefer an mp5 over an m16..but the mp5 is more of a law enforcement gun than battlefield

For once, you've offered something something inadvertently useful...

You are absolutely correct about its functionality....thereby demonstrating the complete absence of justification for civilian use...

In fact, you might even prefer to kill a bunch of people with a Ruger Mini 14....