User avatar
Blackvegetable
26 Sep 2026 11:04 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,389 posts
Huey » 26 Sep 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ 1.  No jury has convicted him of rape.

2.  He was found liable for sexual assault buy a jury in a civil case which has a much lower bar for the burden of proof.

3.  The jury was instructed to use NY State law for rape.  Digital Penetration did not qualify as rape, if in fact he even did that.

Those are all facts.
1. Not relevant 

2. For a SPECIFIC act of Sexual Assault. Broadly defined as rape.

3. You insist on laboring matters irrelevant to the verdict.


 
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search