And you would rather have a crazy person in the White House, so how does that make you any better than me?larryc12 » 22 Oct 2016 8:32 am » wrote:Not projecting, showing the hypocrisy of your accusation of vindictiveness. He probably is indeed a vindictive prick, but Hillary has been showing her claws for decades now. If you deny that, then all I can say is enjoy your irrational state. It's obvious to me that you would rather have a person who turns her back on real lives, who aids enemies for her financial gain, and who lies to the American people over and over again - this person who would be Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces. You would rather have that person than a prick who has been abusive of women, even though you had no problem with a prick who was in office and abusive to women. I have no use whatsoever for an asshole in office, but I cannot abide evil in office. You can. Apparently those abused women are more important than American lives lost for her felonious behaviors, for Bill's and her deals for Uranium 1 to our enemies, or all the other corruption exposed. Pretty bad, Misty.