Liberal Forum

is that a rerun?, OK upon close examination, it has been concluded that the entire contents of that post is:MORE TROLL CRAP...

Here's a beauty. All this utter hogwash to defend the astoundingly stupid proposition that Carter was better on the economy than Reagan! All based on your ignorance and psychosis....

upon close examination, it has been concluded that the entire contents of that post is: MORE TROLL CRAP...

Awww, don't trouble the silly twit with facts and logic. Never try to teach a pig to sing. It won't work, and it annoys the pig....

Back to Reagan just for a moment. A few thoughts occur to me that haven't been discussed. First, unemployment. Lots of numbers floating about but little comment on the fact that Reagan actually changed the way unemployment was counted (in a way that still helps out today's President, ironically). ...

That WAS a beauty. I should find and bump that....

All this utter hogwash to defend the astoundingly stupid proposition that Carter was better on the economy than Reagan! All based on your ignorance and psychosis....

Edited for brevity, retard....

"Alpha male." Holy cow, you are freaking insane. "Cult worship?" No, psycho, after literally decades of reading diverse opinion and sorting out what has been accurate and what has not, I stand by my time-tested sources and have learned to reject deceitful moonbats like Paul Krugman and his ilk...

That was Rich's point. It's just sad that you were too dense to understand. The claim that tax cuts on the rich never benefited the country is an unsupportable claim, because it's never happened. The ONLY way to measure whether a tax cut "on the rich" created jobs or grew the economy, would be t...