User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
17 Feb 2014 02:59 pm
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
That's there's Hall of Fame material....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Silverfox
17 Feb 2014 02:58 pm
Silverfox
User avatar
Oh. My. God. It looks as if only logical fallacies earn respect in some quarters....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
17 Feb 2014 02:58 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Oh my! Imbecile....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
17 Feb 2014 02:57 pm
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
He does it with an economy of obtuse nonsensical verbiage strung together in the hopes someone will regard it as wisdom. He's right on one count. His fellow cons think he's Plato....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
onlyaladd
17 Feb 2014 02:51 pm
onlyaladd
User avatar
Oh ****...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
17 Feb 2014 02:46 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
There it is, folks. There is Glory Hole Clem, in a nut shell. I am going to start a thread with this, and expound further. Glory Hole, you are about to receive the honor of having a thread title with your name in it....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
17 Feb 2014 02:38 pm
RichClem
User avatar
What, are you brain dead? The only sources you cited were for raw statistics, and the only thing supporting your wacky claim about Reagan and Carter is your ignorant, psychotic analysis. Cite a mainstream source, i.e. opinion based on analysis, that backs up your claim that Carter was better on the...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
17 Feb 2014 02:35 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
The adults saw the sources, clemtard. Not one has been partisan. I believe that's what your code words mean - he's not using partisan sources, so he's cheating. Go harrumph elsewhere, you fool. It's all you have left, you redundant hack. You're a spent shell and an embarrassment to the right wing....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
17 Feb 2014 02:32 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Yes, the narrative. As usual, fetishizing all things military and understanding military issues are very different things, son. The Soviets did not need to match us bullet for bullet to defend themselves against us. The MAD doctrine obviated a nuclear war. You may pretend the Soviets did not recipr...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
17 Feb 2014 02:31 pm
RichClem
User avatar
From what I saw in this thread, the psychotic hasn't offered one single mainstream source that supports his claim. So all he is offering is his ignorant, moonbat opinion based on a cherry picked selection of statistics. You people are demented....
— LiberalForum Archive