Liberal Forum

This queer thinks the thread's about obiewan.^^^^ What a clown. Once again, another tard cannot touch my OP. Win CP. Note, also, that the homosexual uses a chart which counts "labor force participation" - a sneaky reagan euphemism for PART TIME JOB!...

FOOL it does not matter how many jobs are created. The jobs lost and required to be created to keep up with population growth need to be equal or less than that number of jobs created or we lose. Currently we need more than 545,000 jobs a month to keep up with population growth. But listen to the ad...

^^^^^ This is why no one respects you. No facts to counter. Just bais vague meaningless ****. Amped up with bolding and insults. You are doing your cause a disservice and I wouldn't be surprised if your own minions tell you to stfu soon....yeah right. Repubs always circle their own burning wagons.....

Shintao does. I do. We're comparing results. It is an objective measure. Your post makes no sense. What difference does it make to our thesis (Reagans suck and Carter rocks), whether we compare averages or compare aggregates? How is one more or less nonsensical than the other, when the only purpos...

Maybe Forbes is lying? To make carter look good? I mean, you can't trust the librul meedja....

Who looks at the average number of jobs created a year? That makes no sense......

Isn't that cute - the troll made a brand new distinction. He always says that I'M a liar, when I have a different opinion......

Yes, he saw reagan's jobs record and beat it by 25% again. But again - that's in a down economy, against a guy using the tax code to push part time work, "teaching to the test," in essence. Backwards engineering his results, in other words - manipulating the data. Hate people who do that....

I need to redo this Just some simple math shows that Carter created 10,300,000jobs/4yrs = created 2,575,000 yr., and Raygun created 16,100,00jobs/8ys = 2,012,500 yr. Looks to me like Carter created 562,500 more jobs a year than Raygun. Everything else is BS!!!...

Yes, Reagan scored 2 million per year. 25% of that is a half million. Carter scored a half million MORE jobs per year that ronald mcdonald. So, if you take reagan's jobs record, and add 25% again, THAT is what Carter produced - but that is half the story. Carter was in a global recession, sitting...