Liberal Forum

So a fact-filled and logic-filled column by a prestigious columnist isn't a source? We're supposed to accept your psychotic moonbat judgment over his? We all know now that you're just an excuse-generating, shameless lying troll....

Did you notice that cannon gave Carter credit for 5 years, 77 through 81? No to mention the "to 154%", which clearly is dishonest, trying to make Carter's "accomplishment" look better than it was....

When someone points out established, accepted reality, psychotics make comparisons with Nazis....

I think you've been drinking too much paint thinner. This thread must really be painful to you....

Would a sane, informed person ever accept such utter hooey? An economy growing by 50% during the Carter years? Freaking ridiculous. And what does his last fiscal budget have to do with anything? You're mixing paint thinner with maple syrup....

Only if you ignore half the story. Like Obama, Reagan had to deal with a recession which Carter and Clinton never did. To take those recessions out of the equasion, your story had this chart:...

I have a subscription and have never heard of the moonbat. But established, accepted reality is that Carter was a disaster on the economy. And Reagan created a huge boom. Stunning that liberals will express their opinions without knowing something so very, very basic....

Two word about Carter's record: Misery Index...

That dastardly left-wing rag Forbes says that Carter had a better job creation record than Reagan...

translation: you have made me look like an idiot too many times, so I am scared to death of that question...