User avatar
Guest
23 Jun 2011 02:13 pm
Guest
User avatar
I think you are agreeing with me actually. As I said in my post, the recovery happened due to cutting spending. This is what you are saying as well, yes?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
23 Jun 2011 02:08 pm
Nobody
User avatar
In the past, such as the great depression and other deep recessions that America has encountered, we usually got out of those slumps by cutting both taxes and cutting spending simultaneously.Not true. Take a look at this chart showing unemployment levels during the Great Depression.Notice how unempl...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Guest
22 Jun 2011 11:51 pm
Guest
User avatar
You left quite a few things out of your argument, like the fact that when Obama took office, we were in a deep recession verging on a depression and hemorrhaging over 750,000 jobs a month, so naturally revenues were dramatically decreased. He had no choice but to borrow.Bush OTOH inherited a very he...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
22 Jun 2011 11:32 pm
Nobody
User avatar
More on Bachmann's taste for pork.Michele Bachmann Literally Praised Government Pork In Letter To Obama Official WASHINGTON -- Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) has built a large part of her conservative appeal on strict opposition to federal intervention in the free market. Her real-time criticism of...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
22 Jun 2011 10:45 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Oh f-ck me naked, you know what I meant. Yes, I got the wording wrong, but the argument is the same.You left quite a few things out of your argument, like the fact that when Obama took office, we were in a deep recession verging on a depression and hemorrhaging over 750,000 jobs a month, so natural...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Guest
22 Jun 2011 10:31 pm
Guest
User avatar
You're confusing the national debt with the yearly deficit.Get back to me when you learn the difference.Oh f-ck me naked, you know what I meant. Yes, I got the wording wrong, but the argument is the same....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
22 Jun 2011 10:23 pm
Nobody
User avatar
I'm not disagreeing that Bush's administration exploded the deficit. When Clinton left office, and Bush began, the deficit was at 4.2 trillion. After 8 yrs of the Bush administration the deficit was at 10.1 trillion. When Obama took office it is now 14.3 trillion. It took 8 yrs for Bush to ring ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Guest
22 Jun 2011 04:36 pm
Guest
User avatar
Bush's two wars, his tax cuts, and his crashing of the economy (lower revenues) are a big part of the current deficit. He's the gift that keeps on giving.Not true. Republicans refuse to even entertain the idea of raising revenues, even if it just means closing tax loopholes. In fact they want to cu...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
22 Jun 2011 04:28 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Actually, RichClem is correct. Obama has literally spent 3.1 trillion dollars within 2 yrs. That's a record even by democrate standards. Yes, of course the republicans have done their share of exploding the deficit, but no where near Obama. Not by a long shot.Bush's two wars, his tax cuts, and h...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Guest
22 Jun 2011 04:18 pm
Guest
User avatar
Another lie, the president has put forth proposals for major cuts.Everytime a republican mentions the word "deficit" they look like such a fool b/c every single one of their heroes were for EXPLODING the deficitby pushing the Bush tax cuts for the rich to the tune of $3.9 trillion.$3.9 TRILLION.That...
— LiberalForum Archive