Liberal Forum

The ACA....

So if Hobby Lobby simply refused to provide any coverage at all, they could have avoided the Supreme Court until the mandate became enforced? i view Hobby Lobby's appeal to the Supreme Court on the basis of a religious objection as being an acknowledgement of the employer mandate, on a whole, which...

Come on..... In progressive lala land, not buying something for a progressive IS violating their rights. See the thread on Detroit water bills for example....

Hey moonbat, why didn't you address this point? You and Ginsberg are stupidly wrong. No one was preventing women from buying birth control. No women's rights were being violated. The issue was over whether individuals running small corporations could be coerced into buying something for employees,...

The problem with an employer mandate. Suddenly, all those providing it voluntarily are lost among those who are mandated to provide it. There doesn't appear to be any legal distinction between the two. Before ACA, companies had the right to battle coverage items out with insurance companies. Now, t...

It's part of the "acceptable plans" that every policy must comply with....

I'm not **** you really, they couldn't argue against the employer mandate until it's implemented, that was part of the original SC ruling on the ACA....

WHY is it such a chore to connect the dots for progressives? Did they not get ample connect the dot playtime as children? Progressive daddy's too busy fondling them?...

But if they provided it of there own free will, they would have had to comply with the rules under the ACA...

Since you came up with the argument on your own, I'll let you argue with yourself, fight club....