Misty » 20 Dec 2016 9:19 pm » wrote:
So you're saying that he committed rape based solely on an allegation, because I'm assuming you were not a witness to this rape.
There were four contemporaneous witnesses including a nurse who treated her.
Given that other rape accusations against him and his history of sexual assault and gross behavior, that's basically ironclad.
Why did you defend dishonestly Clinton for many years on the basis of a false legalistic excuse?
You've always known that a "rapist" is someone who has committed rape and has nothing to do with charges or conviction.