11 Mar 2017 11:53 am
That's quite snarky.Huey » 11 Mar 2017 10:57 am » wrote: According to your article, the entire article, not your snippet, a lawyer for Flynn informed a lawyer with the transition team.
It seems the work, according to your article, was disclosed in September and terminated after his appointment. So again, do you want trump to fire him again? If he hadn't fired him you would bitching about that. Since he fired him you are still bitching about him. To the point the punishment has fit the alleged crime. ****, it ain't like he set up a private server to get around FOIA laws that ended having classified information on it.
Oh, I forgot. You voted for her.
My bad.
First of all, I take offense at you classifying what I posted as a 'snippet' as if I was attempting to deceive.
I often edit long articles to eliminate the parts that are not pertinent to what I am posting about.
I do this, not to deceive anyone, but to save them the time and effort needed to wade through a bunch of extraneous stuff.
Secondly, I think that you constantly asking if I want Trump to fire Flynn again is silly, and really has nothing to do with my post.
My post dealt with the fact that Pence said that he knew nothing about Flynn lobbying for Turkey until this week, and it looks like that was not true.
Aside from Flynn's lawyer advising the transition, which Pence ran, there were reports in 4 or 5 media outlets and Pence received a letter from members of Congress about it.
So because Flynn was fired does that mean that I'm never allowed to mention anything having anything to do with him again?
Like the fact that the VP may have lied about what he knew about Flynn, and when he knew it?