#ShePersisted » 11 Mar 2017 11:53 am » wrote:
That's quite snarky.
First of all, I take offense at you classifying what I posted as a 'snippet' as if I was attempting to deceive.
I often edit long articles to eliminate the parts that are not pertinent to what I am posting about.
I do this, not to deceive anyone, but to save them the time and effort needed to wade through a bunch of extraneous stuff.
Secondly, I think that you constantly asking if I want Trump to fire Flynn again is silly, and really has nothing to do with my post.
My post dealt with the fact that Pence said that he knew nothing about Flynn lobbying for Turkey until this week, and it looks like that was not true.
Aside from Flynn's lawyer advising the transition, which Pence ran, there were reports in 4 or 5 media outlets and Pence received a letter from members of Congress about it.
So because Flynn was fired does that mean that I'm never allowed to mention anything having anything to do with him again?
Like the fact that the VP may have lied about what he knew about Flynn, and when he knew it?
First, let's toss your "offense". You are too sensitive. If you were trying to deceive in this case you wouldn't have posted a
Ink.
NO, MA'am, it does not look like it was not true from Pence according to the information to this point. In order to honestly come to that conclusion you have to prove that the Transition lawyer that Flynn's lawyer talked to told anyone. Did he? Plus, according to your article the information was disclosed in December.
So take your argument that we have to prove Obama knew of the alleged FISA requests and investigations and apply it here.
That's fair.so, do you have that proof?