User avatar
Huey
11 Mar 2017 12:25 pm
11 Mar 2017 12:25 pm
User avatar
      
35,606 posts
#ShePersisted » 11 Mar 2017 12:22 pm » wrote: I saw those posts.

It seems like you are struggling with the fact that we have a POTUS who told us for years that we should not trust the numbers put out by the Dep't of Labor, but now says that the numbers are good.

I may be wrong, but it looks to me like you are trying to sidestep his hypocrisy and change the topic to a discussion about how the numbers are calculated.

So, let me rephrase my question.

Do you believe as the POTUS said yesterday, that the jobs number for February and the 4.7% unemployment rate are the real numbers now?

Or do you still only trust the U6 number?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :
Huey » 10 Mar 2017 3:28 pm » wrote: I don't trust that number.

The one I will trust is the U6 number. I also will watch the number of jobs that are part time. The same gripes hi had when Obama was **** it up. If the US dwindles and the PART TIME jobs number decreases WITH that rate falling than we have success.

Plus, since you applauded that method with Obama you need to be applauding it now.

So you are, correct?

What is wrong with you reading skills?

Lmmfao!

I clearly state I don't trust the numbers. Clearly. What part don't you understand?

I then go and apply the same arguments I used u dear Obama and apply them to trump. What part of that do you not understand?

Your question was answered yesterday before you asked it today.
the proper response from you should have been "I apologize Huey, I forgot about your post from yesterday"
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search