Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2017 2:15 pm » wrote: You're an idiot who cannot distinguish between peer reviewed scholarship and partisan editorials.

This is just too easy.

You're an idiot who thinks a group of liberals agreeing with each other is "peer review scholarship."

So tell me, Dim, then why do most historians make the ridiculous claim, for example, that FDR brought the country out of the Great Depression?

Because most economists believe the opposite, as shows very basic Economics and common sense.

Ooops, there goes the peer review.

And why a Nobel Prize winner in Economics needs peer review? Because quite a number have been carried in the WSJ and other sources I cite.

You rejected them as unworthy of consideration.