Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 2:22 pm » wrote: You're an idiot who thinks a group of liberals agreeing with each other is "peer review scholarship."

That's very clearly your thought, dick weed. You have no concept of intellectual rigor.

Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 2:22 pm » wrote: So tell me, Dim, then why do most historians make the ridiculous claim, for example, that FDR brought the country out of the Great Depression?

Now, you see?

Deep down, it's not me you're mad at.

It's history that you're mad at.

Let me explain. When he took office, we were in a depression.

When he left office, we were not.

That is why historians make the "ridiculous claim" that FDR brought the country out of the Great Depression

Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 2:22 pm » wrote: Because most economists believe the opposite, as shows very basic Economics and common sense.

Wall Street apparatchiks may disagree with HOW FDR brought the country out of the Great Depression. They do not retardedly doubt THAT he brought the country out of the Great Depression - you **** simpleton.

Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 2:22 pm » wrote: Ooops, there goes the peer review.

Yep, your OpEd mill is just as good or better than peer review, fool.

Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 2:22 pm » wrote:And why a Nobel Prize winner in Economics needs peer review? Because quite a number have been carried in the WSJ and other sources I cite.

*** argument from false authority. Obama won a nobel, *** hat. It didn't make his OpEds true, or his facts above checking. Moron.

Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 2:22 pm » wrote: You rejected them as unworthy of consideration.

No, I rejected them as an acceptable source, clown.

Look, you're not going to provide sources up to agreed intellectual standards, and I'm not going to accept less. We're at an impasse. Why you have to keep sucking my dick about it?