Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2017 4:31 pm » wrote:
Oh, so you considered the logic in that opinion piece, but refuse to consider the logic in the ones I cite.
No, I will not and never will waste my time doing hours of research
for an ignorant babbling, paranoid, dishonest wackjob.
Make any ridiculous claims you want about Carter or FDR from raw numbers as you ignore the very basics of Economics and common sense.
I mean, what kind of imbecile would offer an opinion about an economic matter
without understanding the very basics of Economics?
Why don't you look at the raw numbers about particle physics and babble about that?

You've never once asked me to read and respond to an opinion piece.
All you've done is use them as authorities to legitimize disputed proffers of fact. The proper source for government statistics is the appropriate government source, not
hearsay about those sites.
In the case of the Keystone, Crimson Gulf responded to my position by challenging me to rebut the arguments raised in a Forbes OpEd.
I couldn't - so, naturally, I updated my position to reflect my new understanding of the issue. And because I came by my opinion in the matter honestly, no one on my side of the aisle is going to treat me as a partisan hack on the issue, even if they disagree. They know I'm not just repeating the talking points of one side or the other, as you commonly do.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?