9 May 2017 9:01 am
If it's not her job to refuse a president, then why did both Cornyn and Sessions ask her during her confirmation hearing in 2015, if she would refuse to carry out a presidential order that she felt was unlawful or unconstitutional?Termin8tor » 09 May 2017 8:32 am » wrote:The White House Counsel's office issued an opinion that this was legal and Constitutional, and Obama had issued a very similar EO, which was never challenged.
If she sincerely believed it was unConstitutional, she should have resigned.
It's not her job to to refuse a president.
She's a political hack.
This 'political hack' was hired as an assistant U.S. Attorney in Georgia by Bob Barr and she prosecuted and jailed several Democrats including the Mayor of Atlanta.
P.S. What Obama did in 2011 was not 'similar' to 45's EO.
Obama stopped processing Iraqi refugee requests for six months, and it was in response to a direct threat which was a failed plot by Iraqi nationals living in Bowling Green, Ky., to send money, explosives and weapons to al-Qaida.
But don't let the truth get in the way of a good talking point.