9 May 2017 9:07 am
Are you blind or just plain stupid. Sure, she should refuse to enforce an Unconstitutional law by resigning.Misty » 09 May 2017 9:01 am » wrote: If it's not her job to refuse a president, then why did both Cornyn and Sessions ask her during her confirmation hearing in 2015, if she would refuse to carry out a presidential order that she felt was unlawful or unconstitutional?
Clearly she has "grown" during her Beltway career, like so many other hacks have. She might well have been someone to admire years ago, but not over her most recent action.This 'political hack' was hired as an assistant U.S. Attorney in Georgia by Bob Barr and she prosecuted and jailed several Democrats including the Mayor of Atlanta.
It included other countries, but don't let the truth get in the way of your endless lies.P.S. What Obama did in 2011 was not 'similar' to 45's EO.
Obama stopped processing Iraqi refugee requests for six months, and it was in response to a direct threat which was a failed plot by Iraqi nationals living in Bowling Green, Ky., to send money, explosives and weapons to al-Qaida.
But don't let the truth get in the way of a good talking point.
And its Constitutionality has nothing to do with a "direct threat" according to the law itself, which gives any president very broad authority over immigration policy.
This directive will be easily upheld by SCOTUS, perhaps by a 9-0 margin.
Nor will Yates or Democrats be embarrassed that their lies are exposed then.
