Liberal Forum

Misty » 13 May 2017 1:26 pm » wrote:Anyone with a functioning brain (which leaves you out) can see that the Tweet clearly was an attempt to intimidate Comey into remaining silent about what was said during his dinner at the WH.

Like I said in a previous post, Comey now becomes a witness.
45 was intimidating a witness into remaining silent.

In order for there to be a threat, there has to be a consequence, liar.

"Pay the vig or we'll break your legs!" said Vinny da' Weasel.

What is the consequence that Trump can bring against Comey to back up this supposed threat?

Indict him?

Fire him?

Say mean things about him in tweets?

Where's the beef, liar?