Liberal Forum

Misty » 12 Jul 2017 9:42 am » wrote: Yes, there are.
They don't care about the moral aspect.
As long as it can't be proven that someone clearly stepped over the legal line into criminality, ethical standards don't matter to them.

Incorrect. I don't even know what exactly we are allegedly defending. Can you tell us by answering these questions?

1. Where is the proof the lawyer was connected to the kremlin?
2. Where is the alleged incriminating documents concerning Clinton?
3. If we are taking the emails and story at face value nothing was discussed at the meeting concerning Hilary.
3. Since all the stories about collusion concerning these emails are speculative let's speculate. Is it possible that either the meeting was a setup OR the incriminating evidence was a PRETENSE to get a meeting to discuss the adoption issue?
At this point there is no evidence of collusion, no evidence of documents, and no evidence that the 20 minute meeting was any other than what has been published.
Lastly, who leaked this?