Liberal Forum

Misty » 12 Jul 2017 10:11 am » wrote: "Their actions can be unsavory without being illegal."
"Russian collusion claims are no longer the exclusive province of tinfoil-hat conspiracy theorists."
Amen.

I don't even know what exactly we are allegedly defending. Can you tell us by answering these questions?
1. Where is the proof the lawyer was connected to the kremlin?
2. Where is the alleged incriminating documents concerning Clinton?
3. If we are taking the emails and story at face value nothing was discussed at the meeting concerning Hilary.
3. Since all the stories about collusion concerning these emails are speculative let's speculate. Is it possible that either the meeting was a setup OR the incriminating evidence was a PRETENSE to get a meeting to discuss the adoption issue?
At this point there is no evidence of collusion, no evidence of documents, and no evidence that the 20 minute meeting was any other than what has been published.
Lastly, who leaked this?