16 Apr 2011 7:14 am
Considering the job market in almost all cases is quite inelastic, I would say so. Then again, you're an ignoramus on the subject of economics so this is not surprising at all.Oh yeah, my reading about Economics and business for over 30 years made me an "ignoramus."But you, child genius, understand the subject.Stop being so painfully stupid."Inelastic?" From what Marxist tract did you find that silly term?If I remember correctly, you said something along the lines of "sweatshops help third world workers because they would get paid more than what they normally get." Then again, every neoliberal/right wing ragtag I've ever met/conversed with has expressed this opinion so denying it hardly makes a case for you being "honest."Here's what you claimed about me, moonbat:Then again, since you have been an outspoken proponent of sweatshops and involuntary servitude (children who work for their entire lifetimes to pay off their parents' debt in developing countries), none of this is surprising.Do you have a quote of mine expressing support for that?No? Of course not, psycho.Sorry you're so out of touch with facts. What does a stupid, ignorant 50-year old kid know about what's best?Get yourself some professional help, moonbat.