Huey » 18 Jan 2018 5:14 pm » wrote:Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2018 5:09 pm » wrote:I cited Conservapedia, a sound source, yet you ignored that, too in favor of 20 year old information.
Obviously you'll lie no matter what the facts are.
Scarborough has sold out. He's a hack.
That's why he's on MS-LSD, duuuh!
Funny that Misty is laughing at newsbusters when she uses sources like buzzfeed.
Has not been a good start to the evening. First she tries to deny that she isn’t LittleMissMarxist then loses out on the Scarborough debate.
1. I didn't deny anything. I asked if you had any proof that I have a sok.
Post the quote where I denied it.
2. How exactly did I lose the Scarborough debate?
He calls himself a Conservative, and I think it's his right to define himself, not yours or Clem's.
3. I don't even read Buzzfeed, unless I am linked to it through another source, but while it may be left leaning, it is not a wingnut site like Newsbusters.
For the most part, Buzzfeed is factual and very well sourced. If not for a few minor blemishes Buzzfeed would be listed as High for factual reporting. Overall, Buzzfeed is a left leaning source that is almost always accurate in reporting.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed/
Newbusters claims to expose liberal bias much like its parent website MRC, however this site is also very right wing biased like MRC and perhaps even less factual. Newsbusters uses extensive loaded words and always covers just one side of the story. That side always benefits conservatives and is against liberals.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsbusters/