Liberal Forum

Behold the great liberal intellectual of the board!!!!Lying, stonewalling, dissembling, evading, doing anything except admitting the undeniable truth.It's part of the long reported public record that Schippers, House Impeachment Managers and their employees collected sworn testimony and evidence against Clinton.But because I cannot show it here, because Clinton demanded it be sealed for 50 years, you claim that it doesn't exist.Lie much?Yes, yes, the fruit-cake, Schippers...He's a 9/11 truther Puss.Late July 2001: David Schippers, noted conservative Chicago lawyer and the House Judiciary Committee's chief investigator in the Clinton impeachment trial, later claims that FBI agents in Chicago and Minnesota contact him around this time and tell him that a terrorist attack is going to occur in lower Manhattan. According to Schippers, the agents had been developing extensive information on the planned attack for many months. However, the FBI soon pulls them off the terrorist investigation and threatens them with prosecution under the National Security Act if they go public with the information. As a result, they contact Schippers hoping he can persuade the government to take action. Schippers tries to pass the information on to high government officials, but apparently his efforts are ignored. Partly in conjunction with Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm, Schippers is now representing at least ten FBI agents in a suit against the US government in an attempt to have their testimony subpoenaed, which would enable them to legally tell what they know without going to jail. [Judicial Watch, 11/14/01, World Net Daily, 10/21/01, Alex Jones Show, 10/10/01, note the sources are partisan, Schipper's claims are being reported nowhere else]http://www.wanttokno...-11timeline60pgJudicial Watch...World Nut Daily and Alex Jones.OMFG!Thanks for the laugh Puss.Schippers is a paranoid nutcase.So, where's the 'evidence,' clem-bat?You're unstable imo, due to in part, to your inability to identify an opinion from a lie. An opinion can have support...and there are degrees ofsupport. One can argue about sources and or is the assertion put forth, does it carry enough substance from the support/sources presentedin argument. Your tactic's are narcissistic, considering your age, when you declare yourself the winner.+++1000!!!