24 Feb 2012 2:05 pm
You're unstable imo, due to in part, to your inability to identify an opinion from a lie. An opinion can have support...and there are degrees ofsupport. One can argue about sources and or is the assertion put forth, does it carry enough substance from the support/sources presentedin argument.Is the following a lie? There was enough evidence that Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick that many Clinton supporters believed he is a rapist.There was no credible evidence whatsoever that Bill Clinton raped anybodySo the woman Schippers and his staff found extremely credible and the four contemporaneous witnesses who heard her story, saw her trauma and saw her badly bitten lip, including a nurse who treated it aren't credible evidence?Or how about the following?[All your knowledge comes from right wing opinion pieces.You don't know how to think for yourself, and only parrot what you read in those Op-Ed pieces.And you watch Fox NEWS.So, yes. You are a low information voter.Does "all my information come from "right wing opinion pieces?" Do I "know how to think for myself?"Am I a "low information voter?" However much I disagree with you and distrust your sources, you are hardly "low information."How about the following. Could an honest, sane person hold that opinion?I've written intelligently for years about diverse subjects and cited solid sources to support my opinions.But you've never seen any of them?Nobody has Puss.That's a figment of your imagination.Nobody has seen the sources I've cited? Your tactic's are narcissistic, considering your age, when you declare yourself the winner.I'm not unduly modest. When it's painfully obvious that I've won an exchange, I say so. Edited by RichClem, 24 February 2012 - 03:07 PM.