Henry_
24 Feb 2012 3:06 pm
Henry_
posts
Is the following a lie? There was enough evidence that Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick that many Clinton supporters believed he is a rapist.The argument, is there credible evidence that Clinton raped the woman in question..you know or should, that a legal threshold needs to be met in orderfor it to likely end in a guilty verdict. I think you need to ask yourself why no charges were pursued, I am not suggesting that all cases that do notgo forward is due to there not having legal merit. This is where you begin to look not only at the evidence, but who collected it, who is making thecharge of rape. Even if she believed she was raped, there needs to be a fair amount of support for her claim. So the woman Schippers and his staff found extremely credible and the four contemporaneous witnesses who heard her story, saw her trauma and saw her badly bitten lip, including a nurse who treated it aren't credible evidence?Rape is a very serious crime and when Broaddrick contradicted her sworn statement denying he assaulted her..you can see how compromised this would be in a court of law,or you should be able to. Or how about the following?[Does "all my information come from "right wing opinion pieces?" Do I "know how to think for myself?"That is not an inaccurate statement, and anyone can easily search your sources to see for themselves. You are not in the habitof presenting neutral information as a source. Meaning, a series of news sources, a variety if you will, that report on a story versusan opinion of what happened in a particular event. Personally, imo, this could be remedied if you could fact check your opinion pieces.Am I a "low information voter?" However much I disagree with you and distrust your sources, you are hardly "low information." You seem to believe you have all the information you need and reject out of hand, ( without fact checking through a neutral source)alternative news sources/opinions.How about the following. Could an honest, sane person hold that opinion?That is sarcasm, I think, lol. Other than the snip you drew from, I don't know what your conversation was about.Nobody has seen the sources I've cited? I'm not unduly modest. When it's painfully obvious that I've won an exchange, I say so.If it is painfully obvious, you should not feel the need to declare yourself the winner Clem.
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search