24 Feb 2012 3:26 pm
If it is painfully obvious, you should not feel the need to declare yourself the winner Clem.Oh gosh, Henry dodged more questions. There's a surprise.I cannot show it here, because Clinton demanded it be sealed for 50 years, you claim that it doesn't exist.If it's sealed how the spam did you see it?In your dreams?Or did you have to make another one of those phone calls?Oh gosh, did your vision fail you again? How sad.Oh gosh, maybe in the boxes and boxes and boxes of evidence and sworn testimony that Schippers, House Managers and their employees collected? The ones Clinton demanded by sealed for 50 years? Does that give you a hint?Talk about desperate. Let's take a look at the massive voter fraud that was committed.He was convicted of six felonies Puss, but to you that's no big deal, because he carries an 'R' after his name.It wasn't all that big a deal because of the details of what he did and the low sentence he received. He got one year of home detention.Are you alleging that the judge corruptly gave him a light sentence?Do you mean the massive Democrat voter fraud that you're always blathering about?In the five years that Bush's Justice Dep't devoted itself to exposing massive voter fraud by Democrats, they uncovered 81 cases, many of which were people who mistakenly filled out registration forms or misunderstood eligibility rules.Last year the Republican National Lawyers Association decided to look into it and their data showed that 30 states, including the District of Columbia, had 3 or less voter fraud convictions for a 10 year period.And in the states with higher convictions of improper voting, most involved voters improperly filling out registration forms, vote buying, voting in the wrong precinct or a person with a felony conviction attempting to vote.Not quite the rampant voter impersonation of dead people that you right wingnuts are always screeching about.Oh geez, how many times do have to cite all the examples of massive Democrat-committed voter fraud, which somehow you manage not to see?Who are you kidding, geez.Now I could easily cite the sources for everything I just said, since I do have the tabs open, but like you always say, I have cited them many times in the past, and besides you won't bother to read them anyway. LOLI can't see anything, not one bit. No source, no examples, nothing.That's the dishonest stunt you try to pull.