Liberal Forum

It is interesting what you do not seem to acknowledge is missing from Misty and Skeptic's posts. I am not aware thateither of them have ever said, Clinton was an ideal gentleman. I don't hear them saying anything even close to that, yetthis escapes you too.It is your opinion based on evidence that is highly questionable, at best, that he is a rapist. You can hold to your opinion butto refer to Misty or Skeptic as liars is absurd and completely baseless. They have no obligation to accept your sources, noryour opinion.This whole thing started years ago, when I told Clem that I didn't think it was right to refer to anyone as a 'rapist' (which he did and still does constantly concerning Bill Clinton) if they were never convicted of that crime, or even charged with it.That seemed to set him off and he's been after me for years, hounding me about it and practically clubbing me over the head like a baby seal to get me agree with him that Bill Clinton is a rapist. He also loves to try and shame me for not expressing any sympathy for the so-called victim, Juanita Broaddrick.If you were to do a search of his posts over the last few years that contain the words 'rapist', 'Clinton' or 'Juanita Broaddrick' you'd be shocked at the number of results.You're right Henry. I never said that Clinton was an ideal gentleman. We all know he wasn't.With rape being such a heinous crime, I would feel the same way if Clem referred to any other person who was never charged with or convicted of that crime as a 'rapist'.I think it's disgusting.