24 Feb 2012 4:40 pm
Uh, Henry, the rape story was carried on NBC, for a short period into the MSM, and and many Clinton supporters were persuaded by Broaddrick and the evidence.I've cited it many, many, many times.Is that neutral and professional enough for you?What was reported? Broaddrick contradicting her sworn testimony is/should be a red flag for you, if you could reason it out.Henry, all of that was debated over a period of time, and even many Clinton supporters were convinced. One called for his resignation.Many others remained agnostic, but very deeply disturbed. To cite just one mitigating factor, one of the charges that would have been made against Clinton was his allowing his minions to harass, libel, bully and intimidate so many women.Broaddrick said she was deeply intimidated by that; didn't want to be smeared in the national media.It is interesting what you do not seem to acknowledge is missing from Misty and Skeptic's posts. I am not aware thateither of them have ever said, Clinton was an ideal gentleman. I don't hear them saying anything even close to that, yetthis escapes you too.It is your opinion based on evidence that is highly questionable, at best, that he is a rapist. You can hold to your opinion butto refer to Misty or Skeptic as liars is absurd and completely baseless. They have no obligation to accept your sources, noryour opinion.I of course don't demand that they share my opinion, and had they expressed credible, reasonable opinions, I would never have accused them of lying.However they have told undeniable, blatant lies, more than I will try to relate here. Again, little Miss Marxist claimed there was "no credible evidence." That's undeniably false because the evidence was strong enough to convince even many Clinton supporters.Perhaps you haven't seen it, but I have had many, many differences of opinions with liberals on the board, but never, ever accused them of lying, because it was reasonably clear they were sincere in their opinions, however much I disagreed.Little Miss Marxist, skeptic, EC and others are unquestionably dishonest, with a long, long, long record of it,