24 Feb 2012 4:54 pm
Henry, take a close look at this exchange and tell me if you find little Miss Marxist to be debating in good faith, to be honorable over this matter..Once again.....MistyBlue, on 24 February 2012 - 03:48 PM, said: If it's sealed how the **** did you see it?Oh gosh, maybe in the boxes and boxes and boxes of evidence and sworn testimony that Schippers, House Managers and their employees collected? The ones Clinton demanded by sealed for 50 years? Does that give you a hint?Once again what? I never claimed to have seen it.And why are you ignoring my point that the Clinton-loving MSM reported in detail about this for weeks if not months. It's undeniable that Schippers and staff collected "evidence" including sworn testimony.That's part of the historical record, factual, rock solid, which is why you're bleating stupidly about whether I "saw" the evidence or not in a desperate attempt to deny the mountain of evidence against Clinton, literally boxes of it.This whole thing started years ago, when I told Clem that I didn't think it was right to refer to anyone as a 'rapist' (which he did and still does constantly concerning Bill Clinton) if they were never convicted of that crime, or even charged with it.That seemed to set him off and he's been after me for years, hounding me about it and practically clubbing me over the head like a baby seal to get me agree with him that Bill Clinton is a rapist. He also loves to try and shame me for not expressing any sympathy for the so-called victim, Juanita Broaddrick.Oh gosh, you sound so reasonable in this post.Except that you also told undeniable lies in his defense and stonewalled every single bit of evidence of his rape, his felonies, his impeachable acts. Edited by RichClem, 24 February 2012 - 05:54 PM.