Liberal Forum

Henry, all of that was debated over a period of time, and even many Clinton supporters were convinced. One called for his resignation.Many others remained agnostic, but very deeply disturbed. To cite just one mitigating factor, one of the charges that would have been made against Clinton was his allowing his minions to harass, libel, bully and intimidate so many women.Broaddrick said she was deeply intimidated by that; didn't want to be smeared in the national media.I of course don't demand that they share my opinion, and had they expressed credible, reasonable opinions, I would never have accused them of lying.However they have told undeniable, blatant lies, more than I will try to relate here. Again, little Miss Marxist claimed there was "no credible evidence." That's undeniably false because the evidence was strong enough to convince even many Clinton supporters.Perhaps you haven't seen it, but I have had many, many differences of opinions with liberals on the board, but never, ever accused them of lying, because it was reasonably clear they were sincere in their opinions, however much I disagreed.Little Miss Marxist, skeptic, EC and others are unquestionably dishonest, with a long, long, long record of it,What you're saying is, some people can disagree with your conclusions about Clinton but not others...even though they reject your claim she was raped too.Interesting how you personalize it all...you could stop doing that.