Misty » 30 Jun 2017 8:55 am » wrote:If you read this thread what I was pushing very hard was the financial connections between 45, his associates and Russia, which Mueller seems to be looking into as well.Inglorious Bastards » 29 Jun 2017 9:49 pm » wrote:you must address this russian collusion...you were pushing it so bad....do i have to pull 100 of posts???....you need to address....
I have many times said, "follow the money" and that I think that the real story is about money.
Misty » 20 I 2017 11:44 pm » wrote:Kind of reminds me of what T-Bag said to the NY Times about how Mueller shouldn't look into his finances.
One has to wonder what he's worried about.
There’s something. There always is.
Misty » 15 Jun 2017 1:47 pm » wrote:Mueller is looking into it Puss.Termin8tor » 13 Jun 2017 12:16 pm » wrote:Do you have one single shred of evidence of wrongdoing by Trump or his associates?Misty » 13 Jun 2017 11:18 am » wrote:It's all about the money with this bunch.
Always follow the money.
I'll wait.![]()
![]()
![]()
I have said all along that it's all about the money.
Misty » 02 Aug 2017 9:59 pm » wrote:Actually no.Cedarswamp » 02 Aug 2017 9:42 pm » wrote:You suffer from collusion delusion.
I have said all along that I believe that it probably has much more to do with money than collusion, and it looks like Mueller is going down that road.
Misty » 02 Aug 2017 10:52 pm » wrote:That's why I said I 'believe' and 'probably.'Cedarswamp » 02 Aug 2017 10:11 pm » wrote:All you lack is any tangible evidence of......well, actually anything at all.
What I have never said.Misty » 26 Jan 2018 11:05 am » wrote:Mueller does not confide in me.Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2018 10:58 am » wrote:Say, how's that Russian collaboration thing-ey going. Do you have one single shred of evidence yet?
Does he confide in you?
Do you know what evidence he has if any?
I have said all along that this probably has more to do with money, than anything else.
45 is terrified that his dirty business dealings are going to be revealed.
That's why he is working so hard to impede the investigation.
Misty » 12 Oct 2018 1:28 pm » wrote:Can you even **** read?Termin8tor » 12 Oct 2018 12:22 pm » wrote:What federal law did that meeting violate?Misty » 12 Oct 2018 12:11 pm » wrote:The Trump Tower meeting alone is proof of collusion.
I never said that it violated a law jackass.
But it sure as hell showed a willingness on the part of members of the campaign to get dirt on an opponent from a foreign adversary.Misty » 12 Oct 2018 12:11 pm » wrote:The Trump Tower meeting alone is proof of collusion.
Whether that rises to the level of conspiracy, which would be a crime, only Mueller knows.
Misty » 23 Feb 2019 11:39 am » wrote:Personally I don't really care what Mueller's report says.
I have known since before the election that 45 was not fit for the office he holds, and those feelings have only been compounded by what has come to light since the election.
It's clear that he surrounded himself with a bunch of criminals who were perfectly willing to collude with a foreign adversary and use what they knew to be stolen material in order to win an election.
It really doesn't matter to me whether or not Mueller can prove that it rose to the level of a conspiracy
So much for me 'reframing.'Misty » 06 Nov 2017 11:18 am » wrote:Tell me something I don't know jackass.Termin8tor » 06 Nov 2017 10:56 am » wrote:Hey Dim, "collusion" isn't a crime.
Collusion is not a crime, but conspiracy is, and I'm sure that is the crime that Mueller is working on as we speak.
Just because it's not a crime, that doesn't make it right.