Liberal Forum

I think you are quite wrong, here. When a family decides that grandpa gets special consideration due to advanced age, there could be one refusenik - someone like you - who wants to let grandpa die taking the stairs. But he's over-ruled, and the family majority view holds. The decision has the force of law in that household, notwithstanding that for some members of the household it is not strictly "voluntary," as they disagree. They can live with it, or leave. The majority has spoken (or the autocrat, depending on the family).The same is true here. It IS voluntary. And you have the right to be pissy about it, as one who doesn't WANT to volunteer, but has been over-ruled.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNAQ8LLptUoUsing your logic it would be acceptable for the business owner to require the patron or employee to cover the costs of "reasonable" accomodations. Because sometimes, reasonable is in the eye of the beholder, that being the government bureaucrat who has no skin in the game.Now most people would just go along and let grandpa get the bottom bedroom. I'm fine with that. I still hold open doors for women and sexy old ladies. Cause all old ladies be sexy.But there's a big difference between the rules of the household, property owner, and government, who does not own the property in question. By the by, I hold the same position on the Civil Rights Act. Fine if it only applied to government.