Liberal Forum

Oh, look: The swishy little revisionist uses one photo tell tell two lies:1. That we invaded Iraq to "liberate the wimmin-folf" - a fabrication;It was one of many reasons, as you and I have gone over before, you know, when you flee the debate for a while and then come back saying the same crap, like you did right there.2. That women had no right to vote under saddam - a fabrication.On no, she voted, for Saddam. Ever seen the election returns for Saddam elections?He got 100% of the vote. And yet you use those elections as evidence that Iraq was free and their leader democraticaly elected. Dumbazz. Weak.Maybe you should talk to Wayne LaPierre about that.Maybe I should, I've already made a better case for background checks, NON STORED BACKGROUND checks, mind you, than anyone I've seen trying to give ol' Wayne a hard time. Tim Russerts retarded little brother tried his best and looked like the bedwetter he is when he tried to do so.40% of the weapons sold are sold with no backround checks at all, thanks to things like the gun show loophole, which the NRA fights to keep in effect, even though 74% of NRA members believe that loophole needs to be closed.I've heard all that.Thing I haven't heard is a responce from you about my compromise. Oh sure you jump all over the background check deal but no mention of expanding and making federal conceal carry laws. So very liberal of you. Very standard liberal MO. Just as in the fiscal cliff the liberal is not concerned with compromise at all. They just say there are cause then the drive-by media can lie and try to sell that angle.