Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:30 pm

Irrelevant...and I don't....

No...not "designed for"....Military weapons may be, but not those designed for combat, as the AR15 and M16 INDISPUTABLY were...you cannot legally purchase the military VARIANTS, but you can buy the design..

As long as they have, and were designed specifically for, sporting applications...

and no...sitting in a lawnchair firing off a few hundred rounds doesn't qualify as "sport"...

 

Irrelevant...and I don't....

It is relevant because you don't grasp the fact that the Armalite 15 did not become the Sporter.  The M 16 was the Armalite 15.  Colt simply used the name.

No...not "designed for"....Military weapons may be, but not those designed for combat, as the AR15 and M16 INDISPUTABLY were...you cannot legally purchase the military VARIANTS, but you can buy the design..

The AR 15 variants posted to this forum were not designed for combat.  The Armalite 15 was but that was rebranded the M 16, not the Sporter.  The modern day AR 15s are not designed for combat either.   The Henry 45 Colt I posted a pic was SPECIFICALLY designed for combat.  Should that be banned?

As long as they have, and were designed specifically for, sporting applications...

and no...sitting in a lawnchair firing off a few hundred rounds doesn't qualify as "sport"...

Like the Original Sporter they are not designed for combat.  If they were they would be marketed to the military.