Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2014 4:33 am » wrote:
Let us not be efeminate, Huey.
She and I were CLEARLY speaking from the adult world - refering to republicans proposing something WHILE THEY WERE IN CHARGE - not some shallow pretense at an "outline" of a "plan" that they had no chance of passing since they were NOT IN CHARGE ANYMORE.
Act like a man, son.
Huey » 02 Jan 2014 5:09 pm » wrote:
Actually, they had the outlines of a plan prior to Obama. Tax incentives and more market based. I have posted it before. But they caved to the dems.
ANd as I psoted to YOU last night, and probably lost in the her BS, I again say to you I am not arguing with you on that point.
This is what misty does. She reframes what a poster says, starts a cluster ****, and then the topic of discussion. I never said it was a serious proposal, I CLEARLY said it was an outline for a plan, correct? I never said the dems abused the filibuster, but that whacko continued to claim I did. Even after reposting what I said.
The question I have is she:
1. Purposely reframing it to create a cluster ****.
2. Really does not under stand the written word.