4 Apr 2013 2:35 pm
Just out of sheer curiousity, what might those 'huge implications for society' be if the SCOTUS rules in favor of marriage equality?Polygamy. Perhaps a "right" marriage to close relatives or even minors.So you think there's a danger that if marriage between two people of the same sex is found to be a right, then we'll head right down that old slippery slope to polygamy and people marrying members of their immediate family or even children?And you think that the laws that would make those things legal would be likely to pass any legislature, or be upheld by any court?Clem: Almost certainly even more degradation to the hugely important institution of marriage.If marriage is so hugely important then why aren't divorce and infidelity illegal?If anyone has degraded the 'hugely important institution of marriage' it's the members of your own party.People like David Vitter, John Ensign, Newt Gingrich, Mark Sanford, Larry Craig.....I could go on for days.Misty: Although judging by your approval of bestiality porn, I'm guessing you'd be in favor of that.Clem: Where did I "approve" of it?Lie much? When you brushed off New York gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino's sending out of a bestiality video to the people on his e-mail contact list as just 'one animal porno', or just a couple of short clips meant as a joke......it still infuriates me that the Tea Partiers would back a piece of filth like this guy Paladino.Because of one animal porno?Misty, on 29 Mar 2013 - 11:52, said:A couple of bestiality videos Puss.Hey moonbat, he sent a couple of short clips as a joke.You apparently thought that there was nothing wrong with a man running for governor of the state of New York e-mailing people 'woman on horse' videos. So what else am I to conclude but that you approve of that type of filth?