User avatar
RichClem
24 Feb 2012 06:41 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Clearly, I have wasted my time speaking with you about this, lol.When you admit to accepting that other posters reject your evidence as proof Clinton raped Broaddrick and you believe they're honest about their opinion but continue to exclude Skeptic and Misty, who reject your evidence for similar re...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Henry_
24 Feb 2012 05:46 pm
Henry_
User avatar
I'm not sure what you mean. "But not others?"Put it this way, are there liars on the board who are conservative? Isn't it painfully obvious sometimes they aren't being honest?Or put it this way. I disagree with your claims about Iran, and I find your refusal to answer questions to be both comical an...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Skeptic
24 Feb 2012 05:24 pm
Skeptic
User avatar
I'm not sure what you mean. "But not others?"Put it this way, are there liars on the board who are conservative? Isn't it painfully obvious sometimes they aren't being honest?Or put it this way. I disagree with your claims about Iran, and I find your refusal to answer questions to be both comical an...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
24 Feb 2012 05:18 pm
RichClem
User avatar
What you're saying is, some people can disagree with your conclusions about Clinton but not others...even though they reject your claim she was raped too.I'm not sure what you mean. "But not others?"Put it this way, are there liars on the board who are conservative? Isn't it painfully obvious someti...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Skeptic
24 Feb 2012 05:17 pm
Skeptic
User avatar
Oh gosh, you sound so reasonable in this post.Except that you also told undeniable lies in his defense and stonewalled every single bit of evidence of his rape, his felonies, his impeachable acts.You know, there's 'evidence' locked up somewhere left over from Iran-Contra, that Ronald Reagan raped ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Henry_
24 Feb 2012 05:11 pm
Henry_
User avatar
But, he won't. His cheese has slid too far off the cracker.Am I causing you trouble, Henry? No, of course not..besides, you can see how useful my input has been, lol.Oh well....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Skeptic
24 Feb 2012 05:05 pm
Skeptic
User avatar
What you're saying is, some people can disagree with your conclusions about Clinton but not others...even though they reject your claim she was raped too.Interesting how you personalize it all...you could stop doing that.But, he won't. His cheese has slid too far off the cracker.Am I causing you tr...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Henry_
24 Feb 2012 04:57 pm
Henry_
User avatar
Henry, all of that was debated over a period of time, and even many Clinton supporters were convinced. One called for his resignation.Many others remained agnostic, but very deeply disturbed. To cite just one mitigating factor, one of the charges that would have been made against Clinton was his all...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
24 Feb 2012 04:54 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Henry, take a close look at this exchange and tell me if you find little Miss Marxist to be debating in good faith, to be honorable over this matter..Once again.....MistyBlue, on 24 February 2012 - 03:48 PM, said: If it's sealed how the **** did you see it?Oh gosh, maybe in the boxes and boxes and b...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
24 Feb 2012 04:43 pm
Nobody
User avatar
I don't think I ever claimed I "saw" the evidence.....Once again.....If it's sealed how the **** did you see it?Oh gosh, maybe in the boxes and boxes and boxes of evidence and sworn testimony that Schippers, House Managers and their employees collected? The ones Clinton demanded by sealed for 50 y...
— LiberalForum Archive